Disinformation in encrypted environments and social conflict prevention: A systematic review of multisectoral strategies

Main Article Content

Himbler Jacyson Aceval Cienfuegos
Eddie Misael Samaniego Pimentel
Ivan Agui Guillen
Rocío Verónica Rasmuzzen Santamaria

Abstract

Disinformation on private messaging platforms represents a critical challenge for contemporary societies, as encrypted environments enable the opaque circulation of false content, rumors, and polarizing narratives with the potential to undermine public trust and escalate social conflicts. This problem becomes particularly relevant in electoral, health, war-related, and institutional crisis contexts, where WhatsApp, Telegram, Line, and other messaging services operate both as interpersonal communication channels and as spaces for collective mobilization. The objective of this article was to evaluate the strategies implemented by private messaging platforms, governments, and civil society to counter disinformation in encrypted environments and to examine their effectiveness in preventing social conflicts between 2015 and 2026. A systematic literature review was conducted, following structured search, inclusion, and exclusion criteria aimed at identifying studies on technical, regulatory, and community-based interventions against disinformation in private messaging applications. The findings show that platforms have prioritized verification bots, fact-checking chatbots, warning systems, content fingerprinting, and decentralized moderation; governments have adopted regulatory frameworks, counternarratives, transparency measures, and official communication strategies; while civil society has promoted fact-checking, media literacy, verification tiplines, community campaigns, and hybrid communication strategies. The review concludes that the effectiveness of these strategies is differentiated and indirect, as it depends on user trust, institutional legitimacy, cultural adaptation, and compatibility with privacy protections. Therefore, the prevention of social conflicts requires collaborative models that integrate technological innovation, proportional regulation, and community resilience. This study contributes to the field by offering an integrated understanding of how different actors respond to disinformation in encrypted environments and by highlighting the need for context-sensitive interventions that protect digital rights while reducing the social harms associated with false information

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aceval Cienfuegos, H. J. ., Samaniego Pimentel , E. M. ., Agui Guillen, I. ., & Rasmuzzen Santamaria, R. V. (2026). Disinformation in encrypted environments and social conflict prevention: A systematic review of multisectoral strategies. Aula Virtual., 7(14), 1752-1775. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21209952
Section
Articles

References

Badrinathan, S., & Chauchard, S. (2023). “I don’t think that’s true, bro!” Social corrections of misinformation in India. The International Journal of Press/Politics. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231158770

Chagas, V., & Da-Costa, G. (2023). WhatsApp and transparency: An analysis on the effects of digital platforms’ opacity in political communication research agendas in Brazil. Profesional de la Información, 32(2). Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.23

Cocha, D. P. V., Chicaiza, F. P. V., Guevara, A. M. G., Palacios, I. A. M., & Arce, M. (2024). Desinformación en la era digital: El papel de las redes sociales en la propagación de noticias falsas durante conflictos globales. Latam Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 5(2). Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i2.1865

da Costa Figueiredo, C., Antonioli, M. E., & Guimarães Gil, P. (2023). A efetividade de um programa de alfabetização em mídia digital para idosos brasileiros. Comunicação, Mídia e Consumo, 20(58), 219–241. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.18568/CMC.V20I58.2792

de Keulenaar, E., & Alves dos Santos Jr., M. (2026). Normative dislocation: When platforms moderate without memory. New Media & Society, 28(4), 1437–1463. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251364814

Díez-Garrido, M., Farpón, C. R., & Cano-Orón, L. (2021). Desinformación en las redes de mensajería instantánea: Estudio de las fake news en los canales relacionados con la ultraderecha española en Telegram. Miguel Hernández Communication Journal, 12, 467–489. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.21134/mhjournal.v12i.1292

Duarte, J. M. S., & Rosa, R. M. (2023). Desinformación. Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 24, 236–249. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2023.7663

Dudar, V., & Molotkina, Y. (2025). Social communication in crisis situations: The case of Ukrainian media, 2022–2025. Society. Document. Communication, 10(3), 66–81. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.69587/sdc/3.2025.66

Frischlich, L., Klapproth, J., Frank, S., Heckmann, M., Kunze, S. E., & Murgas, T. (2024). Fighting fakes on WhatsApp: Audience perspectives on fact bots as countermeasures. Digital Journalism, 12(5), 700–720. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2341299

Garimella, K. (2022). Community-driven fact-checking on WhatsApp: Who fact-checks whom, why, and with what effect? Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

Gursky, J., Riedl, M., Joseff, K., & Woolley, S. (2022). Chat apps and cascade logic: A multi-platform perspective on India, Mexico, and the United States. Social Media + Society, 8(2), 1–15. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221094773

Kabha, R., Kamel, A., Elbahi, M., & Narula, S. (2019). Comparison study between the UAE, the UK, and India in dealing with WhatsApp fake news. Journal of Content, Community & Communication, 10(5), 176–185. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.12.19/18

Ketners, K. (2026). Social platforms and the transformation of media landscapes in the Baltic states. Society. Document. Communication, 11(1), 38–49. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.69587/sdc/1.2026.38

Krishnan, N., Gu, J., Tromble, R., & Abroms, L. C. (2021). Examining how various social media platforms have responded to COVID-19 misinformation. HKS Misinformation Review. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-85

Kurnia, S. S., Rahman, Z., Cakranegar, D. I., Abdulla, S. I., Setiawan, D. A., Agustini, P. M., & Yenrizal. (2024). Effect of counter-narratives and credibility of sources on emotional response: A study of Instagram and WhatsApp followers. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 24(1), 161–173. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v24i1.170

Lee, T.-H., & Fussell, S. R. (2025). Countering misinformation in private messaging groups: Insights from a fact-checking chatbot. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(GROUP), Article GROUP10. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1145/3701189

Martínez, I. C., Martínez, J. M. R., Zapata, C. M., & Moreno, S. M. (2022). Conversación y difusión de información política en WhatsApp: Un análisis de la “caja negra” desde las teorías de la interacción en redes sociales. Revista de Comunicación, 21(1), 117–136. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.26441/rc21.1-2022-a6

Martín-Neira, J.-I., Trillo-Domínguez, M., & Olvera-Lobo, M.-D. (2023). Ibero-American journalism in the face of scientific disinformation: Fact-checkers’ initiatives on the social network Instagram. Profesional de la Información, 32(5), Article e320503. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.03

Medeiros, B., & Singh, P. (2020). Addressing misinformation on WhatsApp in India through intermediary liability policy, platform design modification, and media literacy. Journal of Information Policy, 10, 276–298. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.10.2020.0276

Melo, P., Hoseini, M., Zannettou, S., & Benevenuto, F. (2024). Don’t break the chain: Measuring message forwarding on WhatsApp. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 18, 1054–1067. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31372

Meyer, T., & Vetulani-C?giel, A. (2025). Transparency as an empty signifier? Assessing transparency in EU and platform initiatives on online political advertising and actors. Policy & Internet, 17, Article e417. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.417

Meyrer, K. P., & Kersch, D. F. (2022). Can high school students check the veracity of information about COVID-19? A case study on critical media literacy in Brazilian ESL classes. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 14(1), 14–28. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2022-14-1-2

Navumau, V., Matveieva, O., Aal, K., Wulf, V., & Rohde, M. (2025). Telegram as wartime infrastructure: Alternative supply chains in Dnipropetrovsk region, winter 2025. I-com, 24(3), 531–543. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2025-0044

Oleksiyuk, T. (2025). The right to access official information as a resilience-improving tool: Ukrainian lessons during wartime. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, Article 101549. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101549

Pasquetto, I. V., Jahani, E., Atreja, S., & Baum, M. (2022). Social debunking of misinformation on WhatsApp: The case for strong and in-group ties. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1), 1–35. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1145/3512964

Pereira Tavares, L., Sá Brasileiro, F., & Costa de Brito, H. (2024). Desinformação em saúde na pós-pandemia: Uma análise a partir da plataforma de fact-checking Agência Lupa. Encontros Bibli, 29, Article e98810. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2024.e98810

Reis, J. C. S., Melo, P., Garimella, K., & Benevenuto, F. (2020). Can WhatsApp benefit from debunked fact-checked stories to reduce misinformation? Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(5). Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-035

Sádaba, C., Salaverría, R., & Bringué, X. (2023). Overcoming the age barrier: Improving older adults’ detection of political disinformation with media literacy. Media and Communication, 11(4), 113–123. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7090

Santin, J. R., Dai Pra, M., & Faccini Neto, O. (2024). Como regular as fake news no Brasil: Análise do Projeto de Lei n. 2630, que institui a Lei Brasileira de Liberdade, Responsabilidade e Transparência na Internet. Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos, 45(97), Article e98509. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2024.e98509

Shahi, G. K., & Hale, S. A. (2025). WhatsApp tiplines and multilingual claims in the 2021 Indian assembly elections. Online Social Networks and Media, 49, Article 100323. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2025.100323

Shahid, F., Agarwal, D., & Vashistha, A. (2025). One style does not regulate all: Moderation practices in public and private WhatsApp groups. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), Article CSCW144. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1145/3711042

Talabi, F. O., Ugbor, I. P., Talabi, M. J., Ugwuoke, J. C., Oloyede, D., Aiyesimoju, A. B., & Ikechukwu-Ilomuanya, A. B. (2022). Effect of a social media-based counselling intervention in countering fake news on COVID-19 vaccine in Nigeria. Health Promotion International, 37(2), Article daab140. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab140

Thu, H., Thu, M. M., & Ali, S. H. (2026). “The first person to reach you becomes dearest to you”: Mapping health information diffusion in Myanmar’s polycrisis through digital strategies, networked pathways, and innovative solutions. Social Science & Medicine, 399, Article 119241. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119241

Tirado García, A., & Alonso-Muñoz, L. (2024). Estrategia de difusión de las agencias de verificación españolas en sus canales de WhatsApp. Index.comunicación, 14(2), 33–56. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.62008/ixc/14/02Estrat

Trollip, K., Gastrow, M., Ramlagan, S., & Shean, Y. (2024). Harnessing multimodal and multilingual science communication to combat misinformation in a diverse country setting. Journal of Science Communication, 23(9), Article N01. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23090801

Vijaykumar, S., Jin, Y., Rogerson, D., Lu, X., Sharma, S., Maughan, A., Fadel, B., Silva de Oliveira Costa, M., Pagliari, C., & Morris, D. (2021). How shades of truth and age affect responses to COVID-19 (mis)information: Randomized survey experiment among WhatsApp users in UK and Brazil. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, Article 88. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00752-7

Wang, A. H.-E. (2022). PM me the truth? The conditional effectiveness of fact-checks across social media sites. Social Media + Society, 8(2), 1–15. Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221098347

Watkin, A.-L., & Conway, M. (2022). Building social capital to counter polarization and extremism? A comparative analysis of tech platforms’ official blog posts. First Monday, 27(5). Documento en línea. Disponible https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i5.12611

Vartiainen, H., Kahila, J., Tedre, M., Sointu, E., & Valtonen, T. (2023). More than fabricated news reports: Children’s perspectives and experiences of fake news. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 15(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2023-15-2-2